Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1984No. 83-10PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence as an habitual offender. See § 775.084(l)(a)2, Fla.Stat.1 Because the “prior felony” relied upon by the judge in enhancing appellant’s sentence was not yet final, it was improper to enhance the punishment. Joyner v. State, 158 Fla. 806, 30 So.2d 304 (1947); Garrett v. State, 335 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Ward v. State, 332 So.2d 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Coleman v. State, 281 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); See also Ruffin v. State, 397 So.2d 277 (Fla.1981).

The sentence is vacated and this cause remanded for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Garrett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EstesNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Breeze v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API