Legal Opinion
525 West End Corp. v. Ringelheim
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 31, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered July 15, 2013, affirmed, with $10 costs.
Respondent-appellant failed to raise a triable issue with respect to her family member succession defense since her status as the niece of the deceased rent-stabilized tenant does not qualify her as a protected “family member” entitled to succession under the applicable regulatory scheme (see Rent Stabilization Code [RSC] [9 NYCRR] §§ 2520.6 [o] [1]; 2523.5 [b] [1]). Although appellant argues otherwise, the 1997 amendment of RSC § 2520.6 (o) brought about by the Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1997 (RRRA) (L 1997, ch…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- 300 East 34th Street Co. v. HabeebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- 245 Realty Associates v. SussisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Third Lenox Terrace Associates v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- South Pierre Associates v. MankowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
4Cited by1 opinion
- CBU Assoc., Inc. v. ForrayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019