Paul Davis Restoration v. Karaman, Unpublished Decision (8-4-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Boris and Lydia Karaman ("the Karamans") appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding that plaintiff-appellee Paul Davis Restoration of Cleveland Metro West, dba Lora Enterprises ("Lora Enterprises") did not violate the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA") and/or the Home Solicitation Sales Act ("HSSA") and that the Karamans' breached their contract with Lora Enterprises. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} At trial, the following facts were established: In July 2001, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Smaldino v. LarsickOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kluss v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griffin Contracting & Restoration v. McIntyreOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Altek Environmental Serv. Co. v. Harris, 2008 Ca 00138 (4-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Santos v. Buckeye 5, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Sal's Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Harbour View Assocs., Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023