Legal Opinion

Paul Davis Restoration v. Karaman, Unpublished Decision (8-4-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2005No. 84824UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Boris and Lydia Karaman ("the Karamans") appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding that plaintiff-appellee Paul Davis Restoration of Cleveland Metro West, dba Lora Enterprises ("Lora Enterprises") did not violate the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA") and/or the Home Solicitation Sales Act ("HSSA") and that the Karamans' breached their contract with Lora Enterprises. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

{¶ 2} At trial, the following facts were established: In July 2001, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smaldino v. LarsickOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Kluss v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griffin Contracting & Restoration v. McIntyreOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Altek Environmental Serv. Co. v. Harris, 2008 Ca 00138 (4-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Santos v. Buckeye 5, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Sal's Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Harbour View Assocs., Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API