Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Hamilton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1906No. Appeal, No. 157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 157, April T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lawrence Co., March T., 1902, No. 60, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Charles G. Alexander v. E. M. Hamilton. Exceptions to report of referee. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was order of the court dismissing exceptions to referee’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal from a judgment based on the report of a referee appointed under the Act of May 14, 1874, P. L. 166,. exceptions to which report were filed by both parties and overruled by the court.

It appears from the-pleadings'that the case involved the settlement and adjustment of mutual accounts of continuous business dealings between plaintiff and defendant, for a period of nearly three years, and including numerous transactions more or less complicated. And it is apparent from the evidence that the case was tried upon the theory that it was to be a final accounting between…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradlee & Co. v. Whitney & KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  2. Lehman v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. PrettymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Newman v. North River Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API