Kropel v. Conlisk
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis
The plaintiff, a member of the police force of the City of Chicago, was summarily suspended for 30 days, after being advised that an anonymous party had charged that he did not reside within the City of Chicago. The plaintiff denied the charge and requested a hearing, but none was held prior to suspension. Following the procedures established by section 10 — 1—18.1 of the Municipal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 24, par. 10 — 1—18.1), the order of suspension was issued without notice or hearing before the police board, or any other body. The plaintiff then filed suit in the circuit court of…
2Cited by44 opinions
- Francis Muscare v. Robert J. Quinn, Individually and as Commissioner of the Chicago Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- D'ACQUISTO v. WashingtonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Francis Muscare v. Robert J. Quinn, Individually and as Commissioner, Chicago Fire Dept.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Hughes v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Czajkowski v. City of Chicago, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.