Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Zimbrick Logging, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1993No. 900484; CA A69264PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendants appeal that portion of a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for impaired earning capacity resulting from her injuries in an automobile accident. We review for errors of law and affirm.

Plaintiff was injured when a logging truck, owned by defendant Zimbrick Logging, Inc. and driven by defendant Pyle, struck the car in which she was a passenger. Plaintiff is a homemaker and a minister’s wife. She has been married since 1971. Since then, she has not been employed outside the home, except for odd jobs. At the time of the accident, four of plaintiff s five children were still at home,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grimes v. HaslettAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Plourd v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Burke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
  4. Conachan v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Weinstein v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LitzenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. DeVaux v. PresbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Groth v. Hyundai Precision and Ind. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Neher v. ChartierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API