Legal Opinion

Nathaniel M. Lewis v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, Director Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General of State of Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2002No. 09-6381PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEEH, District Judge.

In this habeas corpus petition, Petitioner Nathaniel M. Lewis argues that the trial court’s exclusion of certain evidence in his rape trial prevented him from conducting appropriate cross-examination, thus violating his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. Because we find that the excluded evidence reasonably goes to the issue of the victim’s consent, as well as her motive in pursuing charges against Lewis, Petitioner’s constitutional right of confrontation has been violated. Therefore, the district court’s denial of habeas relief is REVERSED in accordance with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Roger Boggs v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Burt Lancaster v. Stanley Adams, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sharon May Rockwell v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Cook v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. McPhail v. RenicoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API