Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1938No. 26596PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

While no declaration need be filed in a justice’s court in aid of an attachment, the failure of the plaintiff to file at the first term a declaration in aid of an attachment returnable to the superior court is such a serious defect as to make it impossible for a valid judgment to be rendered in the case. The requirement of the statute (Code, § 8-601) is mandatory. Callaway v. Maxwell, 123 Ga. 208 (51 S. E. 320); Nixon v. Russell Piano Co., 51 Ga. App. 399 (180 S. E. 743); Nelts v. Reed, 54 Ga. App. 408 (188 S. E. 71). Accordingly, where the plaintiff in the present ease sued out, in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Callaway v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Nixon v. Russell Piano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Netts v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API