Legal Opinion

Acme-Wiley Holdings, Inc. v. Buck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 24, 2003No. 1-03-1099PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice South

This interlocutory appeal arises from an order of the circuit court of Cook County denying plaintiffs Acme-Wiley, Icon and Stonebridge’s motion to stay arbitration of claims asserted by defendant Sieg Buck.

The pertinent facts are as follows. Sieg Buck was hired by Icon as its chief executive officer in November of 2000. Buck and plaintiffs entered into an employment agreement which set out such matters as defendant’s base salary, annual bonuses, employee benefits, equity participation, etc. It further provided:

“SEVERANCE — In the event we terminate your employment for any reason other than…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Salsitz v. KreissIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rauh v. Rockford Products Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Zhen LinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  2. CARO EX REL. STATE v. BlagojevichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Melena v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241 v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Caro v. BlagojevichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API