Bouck v. Bouck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by Elizabeth D. Bouck and John S. Bouck her husband, from a judgment of the District Court of Mille Lacs County, D. B. Searle, J., entered November 24, 1893. On September 8,1892, John Bouck, Jr., entered into an agreement with the appellants to submit to arbitration all demands between him and them and that judgment should be entered on the award.
Read the full summary
Appeal by Elizabeth D. Bouck and John S. Bouck her husband, from a judgment of the District Court of Mille Lacs County, D. B. Searle, J., entered November 24, 1893. On September 8,1892, John Bouck, Jr., entered into an agreement with the appellants to submit to arbitration all demands between him and them and that judgment should be entered on the award. The three arbitrators chosen made their award October 27,1892, and John Bouck, Jr. moved the court that the award be confirmed and for judgment. Elizabeth D. Bouck and husband moved at the same time on affidavits to set aside and vacate the…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This appeal is from the judgment entered upon the award under what both parties assume and concede to have been a statutory submission to arbitration of all demands, of every name and nature, between plaintiff, on the one side, and the defendants, on the other. The award was as follows:
“We find that John Bouck shall be awarded the sum of eight hundred ($800) dollars for services rendered; said sum of money to be paid in four equal payments, of $200 each; the first payment to be made after this award is approved by the court, and two hundred ($200) dollars thereafter every year for three…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nichols & Fay v. Rensselaer County Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Gordon v. TuckerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1830
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ames Canning Co. v. Dexter Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922