Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 12, 1962No. 61-312PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

142 So.2d 115 (1962)

Minerva GOLDSTEIN and Her Husband, Benjamin Goldstein, Appellants,

v.

GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, d/b/a a & P Super Markets; Isador Rudo, Mary Rudo, Max Rudo, and Ida Rudo, Appellees.

No. 61-312.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 12, 1962.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1962.

Richard E. Thomas and Sam Bloom, Miami, for appellants.

Dean, Adams, Fischer & Gautier, for appellees Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., a/b/a A & P Super Markets.

Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for appellees, Isador, Mary, Max…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Simms v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Butler v. ManeySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Becksted v. Riverside Bank of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Campbell v. MazeSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Dabney v. YapaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Keener v. DunningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Troutman Enterprises, Inc. v. RobertsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Giachetti v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API