Miners' Bank of Dubuque v. United States Ex Rel. Grant
Supreme Court of the United States
A motioñ" was made by Mr. Grant and Mr. Hastings to dismiss the writ of error in this case, upon the same grounds as in the preceding case of Sheppard and others v. Wilson, and upon the additional ground, that the judgment in this case was not a final judgment. If it was not a final judgment, the court below is abolished, and the counsel on the other sidennay make whatever use they ean pf the record.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney
This case has been brought here by a writ of error to he Supreme Court of the Territory of Iowa. A motion has'been made to dismiss the writ upon several grounds, and among others, upon the ground that the judgment of the Territorial court is not a final one ; and therefore, under the act of June 12, 1838, ch. 96, § 9 (5 Statutes at Large, 238), caonot'be brought here for revision by writ of v.rror.
It appears that an information in the. nature pf a quo warranto was" filed by the United'States in the District Court of Iowa, against certain persons named in the information, who are now the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Missouri & Kansas Interurban Railway Co. v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Greeley v. WinsorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Bonds, Michael RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Bonds, Michael RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Ex parte BushnellOhio Supreme Court · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.