Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 28, 1848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Grant Circuit. Assignee and assignor. Diligence. Assumpsit. Case 19.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Makshall

This action of assumpsit was brought by Taylor & Byers, assignees, against Daniel, as the assignor of a note executed by Green White, whosé administrators were prosecuted to a judgment and return of “nulla bona,” and the only question necessary to be stated is, whether due diligence had been used in taking out execution on the judgment against said administrators.

It appears that twenty three days had elapsed after the rendition of the judgment, before the execution issued, which shows a delay of ten days after the execution might, by law, have been taken out. It was *54proved, by the attorney,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell County v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Ward v. ReesWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Branaugh v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API