Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Wainwright

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 17, 1968No. 36869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this cause should be discharged on the ground that petitioner has failed to show a timely pursuit of appellate remedies in proceedings presenting the same issues under Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, Stewart v. State, Fla.App., 159 So.2d 681. See Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 868; Hillhouse v. State, Fla.1963, 159 So.2d 228; Zuniga v. State, *212Fla.App. 1966, 184 So.2d 659, cert. dis. 189 So.2d 635, cert. denied 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 404, 17 L.Ed.2d 307.

CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. Zuniga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Hillhouse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Adams v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Hatcher v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API