Film Transit Co. v. Crapps
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentHall, J.
I respectfully dissent from tbe majority bolding in this case to tbe effect that tbe two quoted instructions were in irreconcilable conflict. I think the controlling opinion is erroneous and that this error arises from tbe fact that tbe opinion places undue emphasis on the word “immediately” and gives it a strained and narrow *136meaning, assuming that it means “instantly” and nothing else. It is significant to observe that not a single authority is cited to support the majority view.
In 42 C. J. S., pages 387-388, the following is said with reference to the word “immediate”:
“A comprehensive and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lucedale Veneer Co. v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Knox. v. Wyoming Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Green v. MaddoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Lamar Hardwood Co. v. CaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Fairly v. AlbrittonMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.