Legal Opinion
DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. Barrese
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mercure, J.
In connection with his April 28, 1983 purchase of an inter*101est in dairy cattle from Dreamstreet Holsteins, Inc., defendant executed a number of instruments, including a promissory note and security agreement. Dreamstreet subsequently pledged the note as security for a loan from Cooperative Céntrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A. (hereinafter Rabobank), which in turn assigned it to plaintiff. The note provided, among other things, that defendant was to pay a total of $240,000, together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Of this amount, $20,000 was due…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. HaskellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Express Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Old Colony Trust Company v. StumpelNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. KuntzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. ReinosoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. RenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. RenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993