Jenkins v. Kuhne
New York Supreme Court
Application to punish the respondent for contempt for disobedience to a writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
Upon the hearing of this application, the respondent seemed to be more concerned to discover alleged technical defects in the writ and the proceedings to punish him for disobedience of it than to meet the questions involved upon the merits. The technical questions will be first considered.
The respondent claims the writ to be void for two reasons:
First, That it was not issued under seal, and
Second, That material alterations had been made in it after the writ had been signed by the justice issuing the same.
While the statute provides that such a writ must be issued under the seal of the Supreme…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- McGlennan v. MargowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Clute v. SmallNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Krouskop v. ShontzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- In re StacyNew York Supreme Court · 1813
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. SkinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Jensen v. SevyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- People ex rel. Lobenthal v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Allen v. PeriniDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
- People ex rel. Whitman v. WoodwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.