Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Neal

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

This appeal turns on whether two race cars, and associated automobile parts, owned by Richard K. Neal, were vehicles “used for recreational purposes” within the meaning of Neal’s standard homeowners insurance policy issued by Farmers Insur- anee Exchange (Farmers) or, more precisely, whether there was sufficient evidence presented at trial that they were so used. Because we find there is sufficient evidence supporting the trial court’s judgment, we affirm.

Background

During the time period 1992 to 1996, Neal purchased two race cars — a Boulton Supercomp…