Legal Opinion

Dubray v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 2001No. 99-02514; A110816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming an order of an administrative law judge (ALJ) that determined the amount of claimant’s permanent partial disability. He argues that the ALJ found that the existing rules do not cover his condition and that the ALJ should therefore have remanded the case to the Director for the promulgation of a temporary rule. See ORS 656.726(4)(f)(C); Gallino v. Courtesy Pontiac-Buick-GMC, 124 Or App 538, 863 P2d 530 (1993). SAIF argues that the ALJ correctly concluded that the existing rules apply to claimant’s condition and that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gallino v. Courtesy Pontiac-Buick-GMCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urban Outfitters, Inc. v. United Construction Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API