Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Headley v. Mancusi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1974No. Nos. 67 Civ. 169, 64 Civ. 2071 and 68 Civ. 1728Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.

In their consolidated petitions for habeas corpus 1 petitioners Headley, Huntley and Sams raise four constitutional challenges to their 1960 conviction for armed robbery. They claim: (1) that the admission into evidence of an illegally seized gun violated the exclusionary rule laid down in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961); (2) that the admission into evidence of Huntley’s confession implicating the other petitioners, coupled with his failure to take the stand, deprived Headley and Sams of the right ,to…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API