Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rogers v. Mellon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1927Published

1Dissent

GIVENS, J.,

Dissenting. — This case was formerly before this court and judgment for respondent was reversed. (Rogers v. Davis, 39 Ida. 209, 228 Pac. 330.)

Assignments of error 1 to 14, inclusive, and 21, are based largely upon the issues involved in In re Barr, ante, p. 400, 252 Pac. 676, also before this court, decided January 6, 1927. From the conclusion reached in that case it appears that for the purposes of this action E. J. Rogers was a duly and legally acting administrator of the estate of Harry Barr, and whose appointment by the probate court of Power county because of lapse of time had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re the Estate of BarrIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API