Legal Opinion · Dissent

Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. Cline

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1999No. 96-3356, 96-3588, 98-0029-W]Published

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 57. (dissenting). Today the majority announces the discovery of an evi-dentiary privilege previously unheard of in this state. Although unrecognized to date by the bench, bar, or legal scholars, the majority claims that this privilege really has been in existence for the last 25 years. Because the majority ignores the requirement for express legal authority to create such an evidentiary privilege, needlessly discards precedent, and wastes an opportunity to meaningfully address the continuing *100problem of incivility in the discovery process, I respectfully dissent.

pH

A

¶ 58. The majority first…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. State v. KlessigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API