Legal Opinion

Andresen v. Terex Advance Mixer, Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 6, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00676Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION KATHRYN ANDRESEN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-CV-676 JD TEREX ADVANCE MIXER, INC, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER The Court now considers a motion for judgment on the pleadings brought by Defendant Terex Advance Mixer Inc. (DE 43.) In Defendant’s motion, it argues that any independent claims for loss of consortium and punitive damages brought by Plaintiff Kathryn Andresen must be dismissed. (DE 44 at 4.) Defendant also argues that punitive damages may not be recovered under Indiana’s wrongful death act. (Id. at 5–6.)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Unite Here Local 1 v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Brian Yost v. Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity- Indiana Gamma Chapter at Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, Inc., and Nathan CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API