Legal Opinion

O'Leary v. Hearst Magazines, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMacGregor, J.

The defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings and admissions of fact and for a dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state a cause of action.

The action is based upon an alleged libel. In 1935 a story written by a well-known author appeared in four consecutive monthly installments in the Hearst’s International-Cosmopolitan magazine under the title “ Hard To Get.” The hero of the story bore the name of “ Dan Solaire.” The plaintiff claims that he was the one intended by the author to be pictured as the fictional character, and bases such claim upon the fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. More v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Bennet v. . Commercial Advertiser Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Luna De La Peunte v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kloor v. New York Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Newby v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Birnbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API