Legal Opinion

Michael Kemp, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. C.O. I Antonio Balboa, Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1994No. 92-2038, 92-3451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

In this case, a state prisoner filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), accusing a prison guard of improperly confiscating his medication used to control his epilepsy, resulting in the prisoner’s having epileptic fits, which injured him. The jury found for the prisoner, but awarded him only nominal damages of $1.00 and punitive damages of the same amount. The prisoner challenges the award of only nominal damages as based upon inadmissible evidence, and the guard appeals from the award of attorney fees against him. We hold that the district court improperly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Verne Allen LyonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Williams v. ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Cannon v. Dehner -- See Order at [59] Upon Entering Final Judgment as to Karberg, Potter, Neuhaus, and BarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
  4. Johansen v. Combustion EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API