Legal Opinion

Oberlander v. Eddington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1964No. 39615Published

1Opinion of the Court

391 P.2d 889 (1964)

Esther OBERLANDER and Harold Eddington, Jr., Plaintiffs in Error,

v.

Harold EDDINGTON, Defendant in Error.

No. 39615.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 28, 1964.

Oden & Oden, Altus, for plaintiffs in error.

Harbison & Whiteside, Altus, for defendant in error.

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Esther Oberlander and Harold Eddington, Jr., defendants below, from a judgment in favor of Harold Eddington, (Sr.), plaintiff below, adjudging plaintiff to be the owner of an undivided one-quarter interest in a half section of land located in Jackson County, Oklahoma. Plaintiff also secured…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chism v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. National Exploration Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Matthewson v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API