Legal Opinion
Transcontinental Ins. v. Stanton
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 1935No. 5235PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.
The action was on appellant’s policy for $8,775 issued to appellee indemnifying her against loss on jewelry and furs as in the policy itemized and valued at a total of the face of the policy. The declaration charged the loss to appellee, by theft, of items of jewelry scheduled in the policy at a total of $7,900, and of the market value of that amount.
To the declaration appellant filed the general issue and two amended pleas, which will hereinafter be more fully described. To the special pleas appellee’s demurrer was sustained.
At the close of the evidence the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paddleford v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Schilling v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- American Employers' Ins. v. Raton Wholesale Liquor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941