Legal Opinion

(PC) Shanks v. Mendez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 9, 2022No. 1:20-cv-01083Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN SHANKS, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01083-JLT-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. ) REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 E. MENDEZ, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 54) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Darren Shanks is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed December 21, 21 2021. 22 I. 23 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 24 This action is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API