Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Atchely

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 6, 2024No. 4:23-cv-03455Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CORREY MITCHELL, Case No. 23-cv-03455-JST 8 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR 9 v. A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN 10 MATTHEW ATCHELY, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Respondents. 11 Re: ECF No. 2 12 13 Petitioner filed this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 14 § 2254. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES this petition as second or 15 successive within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), and DENIES a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Rose v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API