Legal Opinion

Duncan v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 29, 2012No. 2011-3053PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Chief Judge.

The Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) held that as a matter of law the petitioner Nyles Duncan had not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate his claim. Because, under the facts of this case, Mr. Duncan failed to offer sufficient evidence to support his claim, this court affirms.

I

Federal employees are entitled up to 15 days each year of military leave to attend training as a member of a reserve of the armed forces (e.g., the Air Force) or member of the National Guard. 5 U.S.C. § 6323(a)(1). In Butterbaugh v. Dep’t of Justice, this court held that federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Kelly Butterbaugh, Roseanne T. Faltin, John C. Marderness, Robert J. Bono v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  3. Paul v. Connolly v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Pucilowski v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tierney v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Tierney v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Tierney v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API