Legal Opinion

Dana Mohammadi v. Augustine Nwabuisi

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 25, 2015No. 14-50115UnpublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Primarily at issue in this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is which of two limitations periods applies: two years for an ordinary, or three years for a willful, violation. On cross-motions for summary judgment in Dana D. Mo-hammadi’s FLSA action against former employers Augustine Nwabuisi, Rose Nwabuisi (Nwabuisi), Resource Health Services and Resource Care Corporation (collectively Resource), see generally 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., the district court, inter alia, awarded Mohammadi partial summary judgment on liability, liquidated damages, and the three-year…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Green v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Parrish v. Premier Directional Drilling, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Mohammadi v. NwabuisiDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
  3. Badon v. Berry's Reliable Resources, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Bookhardt v. Associated Wholesale Grocers IncDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  5. Bush v. Kadirnet, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API