Dugger v. Tayloe
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court of Marengo. Tried before Hon. Luther E. Smith. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtB. E. Saeeold, J.
—
The suit was in the nature of ejectment by the appellants against the appellee to recover land. The plaintiffs claimed title through Henry Dugger, who died seized and possessed of the property. They were his heirs-at-law, except Alice G. Dugger, who was a purchaser of the interest of one of the heirs. The defendant resisted on the ground that he was a purchaser at a sale made by the administratrix of Henry Dugger, under a decree of the probate court, and that the sale had been confirmed, and the purchase-money paid.
The evidence was that the administratrix of Henry Dugger applied by petition,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Deslonde & James v. Darrington's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Dugger v. TayloeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- May v. MarksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Uptain v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Farley v. Dunklin & ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.