Legal Opinion

Verspyck v. Franco

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 8, 2005No. AC 23813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 52-568,1 two property owners sued to recover damages for vexatious litigation arising out of a federal action in which a trustee unsuccessfully alleged that their acquisition of the property had violated the terms of the trust. The federal action was dismissed because of a failure to *255record the underlying trust instrument. In the Superior Court, the property owners alleged that the trustee had brought the federal action without probable cause, and they disputed her claims that she had acted on the advice of counsel and that any damages assessed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Verspyck v. FrancoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Verspyck v. FrancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Segal v. SegalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Social Services v. JoynerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Emigrant Mortgage Company, Inc v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  3. Verspyck v. FrancoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API