Allstate Insurance v. Burrough
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff AUstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) has filed this action seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or to provide coverage to its insured, Mark Bur-rough. The parties have stipulated to a record and upon careful review of the record, the court is prepared to rule.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Mark Burrough is covered by an Allstate homeowner’s insurance policy that obligates Allstate to pay any “damages which an insured person becomes legaUy obligated to pay because of bodily injury or property damage arising from an occurrence…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Guaranty National Insurance v. Denver Roller, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Keller v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. SchmittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Hooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. HadleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Mark Burrough, Garnette Bell, Individually and as Next Friend of Kenyatta WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.