Sheple v. Page
Supreme Court of Vermont
This was an action on the case in three counts; The, dedefendants severally pleaded not guilty. At the November term of the county court, 1836, the cause was tried, and the jury found the defendant, Daniel W. Page guilty, and the other defendant, not guilty.
Read the full summary
This was an action on the case in three counts; The, dedefendants severally pleaded not guilty. At the November term of the county court, 1836, the cause was tried, and the jury found the defendant, Daniel W. Page guilty, and the other defendant, not guilty. The plaintiffs reviewed, and, by leave of court, filed the following additional count to the declaration, viz: And also in a plea of the case for that the said plaintiffs and said Daniel W. Page and one Reuben Crosby heretofore to wit, at Lowell aforesaid, from the 13th day of September, A. D. 1833, to the 20th day of December, A. D.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bennett, J.
— This case comes before the court upon two bills of exceptions, one allowed to each of the defendants ; and upon a motion in arrest for the insufficiency of the declaration. The declaration sets forth an action on the case in the *533nature of a conspiracy ; and, in the argument, no objections to . . . the declaration have been pointed out; and we do not discover any that can avail the party.. The declaration states, in substance, that after D. W. Page had ceased to have any interest in either of the co-partnerships, and the plaintiffs had…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hunt v. SimondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- Paine v. TildenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- Vermont Castings, Inc. v. Evans Products Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1981
- Severinghaus v. BeckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Booker v. PuyearNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.