Legal Opinion

Spradlin v. Klump

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1968No. 5-4577PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an action by the appellant against his former employers, the appel-lees, for damages for the loss of his right hand and forearm in an accident not covered by the workmen’s compensation law. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants at the close of the plaintiff’s proof. We have concluded that the appellees are right in their contention that Spradlin’s asserted cause of action is barred by the doctrine of assumption of risk.

The appellees, Klump and Raceland Farms, Inc., were engaged in raising and training thoroughbred race horses on a farm near…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. Henry Wrape Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Jones v. MayberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Standard Oil Co. of La. v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Rhoads v. Service MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
  3. Moore v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Quinn v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
  5. Capps v. McCarley & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API