Legal Opinion

Krise v. Meyers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1977No. 54004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

The jury returned a verdict for Meyers, the defendant in the trial court. Krise appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial based on general grounds and on special grounds asserting the court erred in certain evidential rulings. We find no error and affirm.

Krise brought this negligence action to recover for injuries he sustained when the car in which he was a passenger collided with Meyers’ car. The evidence showed that it was a rainy day and Meyers was traveling in a line of traffic on U. S. Highway 278, at a speed of thirty-five to forty miles per hour and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Herman v. SladofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Cartey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Hutchinson v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Tripcony v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feathers v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Roe v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Krise v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API