Legal Opinion

Van Gorder v. Lundy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 8, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Audubon District Court. Action to foreclose a mortgage. The plaintiff and the defendants, Jones, Dickey & Oo. appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

i mortgageagreem£’itlto gageffseooncf" pincfiafoior ciosure'ofsoeondmortgage, and judgment for both® pay- 011 meSt:°re-uds' equities oi patties. As between plaintiff and Jones, Dickey & Co. there is n'o serious dispute as to the facts. In 1881 the cfofondárd Lundy executed a mortgage on real estate> which the plaintiff seeks to foreclose in this action, which will be designated as the Lombard mortgage. In 1882 Lundy sold and conveyed the mortgaged property to the defendant ' o o r i ./ Foster, who agreed, as part of the consideration ' ° * x or Purchase money, to pay the Lombard mortgage>…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. English v. OtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Soltow v. RotiiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SilvestroOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cochran v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Cochran v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API