Legal Opinion

Eades v. Morrilton Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 8, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating tile facts). Counsel for the defendants contend that the chancery court erred in finding that M. H. Dean took the acknowledgment of J. A. Eades and Mrs. Almedier Eades, his wife, to the mortgage. The burden of proof was on the defendants to establish this fact. Miles v. Jerry, 158 Ark. 314, 250 S. W. 34; Foster v. Graves, 168 Ark. 1033, 275 S. W. 653; Thompson v. Kinard, 158 Ark. 1057, 272 S. W. 1057; and Hildebrand v. Graves, 169 Ark. 210, 275 S. W. 1024. Bearing in mind that the burden of proof in this resp'ect was upon the defendants, we do not think that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Titus v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Miles v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Davis v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Foster v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Bank of Benson v. HoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. First National Bank, Crossett (In Re Bearhouse, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989
  2. Clifford v. Federal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Walthall v. McArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API