Legal Opinion

State v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 2, 1997No. 96-1013-CR, 96-2822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON J.

Randall S. Baldwin and Gregory A. Busch claim that the trial court erred in failing to suppress the breath test results from an untested, unevaluated and unapproved Intoxilyzer Model 5000, Series 6400. We reverse Busch's conviction for operating a motor vehicle while having a prohibited alcohol concentration (OMVPAC) because the automatic admissibility and the prima facie presumption of accuracy of breath test results are directly tied to the evaluation and approval of the breath testing instrument by the chief of the Department of Transportation's chemical testing section. Here,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Scales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Waushara County v. GrafWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BurkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. DischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BuschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. DoerrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. County of Dane v. WinsandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API