Liddell v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Walter Lee Liddell appeals his convictions for rape, criminal confinement, and related offenses. Liddell was accused of sexually assaulting two girls. His defense at trial was mistaken identity. On the fourth day of trial, the State called a late-discovered eyewitness. Liddell moved to exclude the witness or allow a continuance to prepare accordingly. The trial court denied both requests but ensured Liddell an opportunity to depose the witness before he appeared. The new witness testified that Liddell was with the victims on the night in question and drove…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Murray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James F. Griffith v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Thomas L. Hale v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Buddy J. Livesay v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Thomas L. Hale v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015