Legal Opinion

Mirelez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 25, 2002No. 5D01-2263PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the conviction but remand to the trial court to correct an inconsistency between the orally pronounced sentence and the written sentence as to Count XIV. The trial court orally pronounced a five year sentence while the written sentence imposed a prison term of 15 years for this count. The error is clear and its correction does not change the aggregate sentence appellant received.

Therefore, the appellant’s conviction is affirmed and the matter is remanded for correction of the sentence as to Count XIV.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ.,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenberg v. MoralesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API