Reeves v. Lamm Bros.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hardin District Court. — Hon. J. R. Whit-AKER, Judge. ActioN to recover under contract for purchase price of a separator and other machinery, and also on account for the value of said ■machinery’and other items. Verdict for plaintiffs. Motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial were sustained, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.
In a motion submitted with the case appellees ask that the action of the trial court sustaining the motion for a new trial and tbe motion in arrest of judgment be affirmed on the ground that the assignments of error are not sufficiently specific. These assignments in full are as follows: “First. The court erred in sustaining motion for new trial and in sustaining each and every paragraph and assignment thereof numbered from one (1) to fifteen (15), both inclusive. Second. The court erred in sustaining defendants’ amendment to motion for new trial, and in sustaining each and every paragraph…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Fitch v. Mason City & Clear Lake Traction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Pryne v. PryneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holt v. DotySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Reeves & Co. v. Lamm Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907