Legal Opinion

Simonson v. First National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The evidence demonstrates that plaintiffs, as brokers, were not the procuring cause of effecting the sale. They are not entitled to recover, “even though, to some extent, the seller might justly be said to have availed himself of the fruits of the broker’s labor.” (Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Company, 83 N. Y. 378.) The plaintiffs failed in their duty, as brokers, of bringing the seller and the buyer to terms. (Gallagher v. Dullea, 199 App. Div. 119.) That…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Gallagher v. DulleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Haase v. UllmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Loewenthal v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Egan Real Estate, Inc. v. McGrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Munson v. TilleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Veatch v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API