Legal Opinion

Hall v. Carroll

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1960No. 94PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

These actions were not brought within two years after the deaths of plaintiffs’ intestates. G.S. 1-53(4). They are, therefore, barred unless kept alive as continuations of former actions. G.S. 1-25. The trial court made extensive findings of fact and concluded as a matter of law the present actions are new, and dismissed them.

The court properly found the plaintiffs are the same, but that John S. Singleton, Andrew E. Cox, Sr., and Florence Carroll, original defendants, were omitted, and Champion Fibre Company was added as party defendant. The prayers for recovery were $50,000 in each of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trull v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Walker v. StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Cherokee Insurance Ex Rel. Weed v. R/I, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Hardbarger v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Beam v. AlmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API