Greend v. Kummel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans. Tissot, J. Parties who have associated themselves for the purpose of carrying on a commercial business, may adopt a symbolic firm name representing them collectively, such as, “ Standard Music and Photo. Lith. Co.” Bates on Partnership, Yol.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans. Tissot, J. Parties who have associated themselves for the purpose of carrying on a commercial business, may adopt a symbolic firm name representing them collectively, such as, “ Standard Music and Photo. Lith. Co.” Bates on Partnership, Yol. II, 1147. 7 M. 215, and where in using such a film name the parties have by consent, on their cards, letters, bill heads, etc.. used the “plural,” advertising themselves, as printers, publishers’ agents, etc., it is an admission that there existed between them a partnership. Bates on Partnership,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Watkins, J.
The litigated question in this ease is whether or not a partnership exists between the two plaintiffs and the defendant.
The claim of the plaintiffs is that during the fall of 1886 they formed a partnership, for the purpose of lithographing and publishing music, in the city of New Orleans.
That for many years previous thereto,.Welirmanu had been engaged in that business in tins city, and was, at the time of forming said part*67nersMp with Greend, the owner of $2500 worth of material, tools, engraving and paraphernalia, and sufficient machinery to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- F. J. Dubos & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932