Legal Opinion
Langle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 22, 1990No. 89-959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOSHORN, Judge.
David L. Langle appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habe-as corpus, urging that the Florida Parole and Probation Commission (FPPC) violated *658his due process rights by failing to timely grant him a final revocation hearing. Because Langle failed to demonstrate any prejudice resulting from the delay, we affirm.
Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-21.-022(12) (1987), which governs the FPPC's operations, provides in pertinent part:
If the Commission decides to conduct a final revocation hearing, an order shall be entered to that effect and shall be served…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Robert Lee Frick v. Mr. Quinlin, Superintendent, United States Prison CampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Eaddy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Stevenson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gillard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Taylor v. DuggerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Mattern v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998