Peterson v. State

I would respectfully dissent.

In his only point of error, appellant claims the trial court erred by permitting the State to file an amended information during the trial over his objection.

The record reflects that a complaint and information in the delivery case were filed on December 2, 1985. The complaint alleged that the offense occurred on or about October 14, 1985, whereas the information alleged that the offense occurred on or about October 15, 1985.

*25On February 7, 1986, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to quash the information in which he alleged it rendered him “unable to…