Legal Opinion

United States v. Henley

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1998No. 5:97-hc-00970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.

On April 30, 1998, Magistrate Judge Alexander B. Denson filed his Memorandum and Recommendation (“M & R”) with regard to an evidentiary hearing pertaining to the respondent pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(a). On May 8, 1998, the respondent, through counsel, filed a response to the magistrate judge’s M & R indicating that the respondent no longer desired to contest the government’s motion to commit him pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246. Accordingly, the respondent did not wish to file objections to the magistrate judge’s M & R.

After having reviewed the M & R and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Philip PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Mary W. HINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Randell GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Dorian WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Dorian WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API