United States v. Henley
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.
On April 30, 1998, Magistrate Judge Alexander B. Denson filed his Memorandum and Recommendation (“M & R”) with regard to an evidentiary hearing pertaining to the respondent pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(a). On May 8, 1998, the respondent, through counsel, filed a response to the magistrate judge’s M & R indicating that the respondent no longer desired to contest the government’s motion to commit him pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246. Accordingly, the respondent did not wish to file objections to the magistrate judge’s M & R.
After having reviewed the M & R and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Philip PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Mary W. HINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Charles Randell GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Dorian WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Dorian WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998