Legal Opinion

Barrett Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 16, 1925No. A-107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge

The Navy Department during the war needed and sought to obtain larger quantities of xylol. The source of supply was limited, and while the process of extracting xylol from naphtha was not in all respects perfected, it had been successfully done and xylol sold on the market. The Barrett Co., the plaintiff herein, was engaged in this identical busi- • ness, but was not in a position to meet the demands of the department because of limited facilities and much curtailed output. The department wanted at least 225,000 gallons of xylol a month. To this end negotiations were entered upon between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell Motor Car Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API